| EXERCISE II, Part A |
|
|
Suggested amendments to the exercises |
|
|
EX. II, Part A. |
|
See the Ashmoleum Museum answers. Mine are similar except that I would begin ALL sentences with the particle iw (thereby making them plain, independent statements) whereas Gardiner has only done this occasionally.
|
|
|
| 1 [iw] wbn ra m Axt |
|
|
| 2. [iw] Dd z gr s.t |
|
|
| 3. [iw] xd sS m dp.t r niw.t tn |
|
|
| 4. [iw] sDm sS pn n ptH |
|
|
| 5. iw ra m pt Hna iaH |
|
|
| 6. [iw] xm sS ky sxr |
|
|
| 7. [iw] hAi dp.t pn r S |
|
|
| 8. [iw] sDm nDs pn rn |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: (for those that are interested)
Verbal statement/sentence: this follows the ideas of Mark Collier, Antonio Loprieno and others who take these types of sentences as verbal, ie. similar to the english translation of this example ('Ra rises from the horizon'). In Polotskyan grammar these would be classified as adverbial, something like: "It is that Ra rises from the horizon", but the polished english translation by this grammar would still be given as 'Ra rises from the horizon'.
circumstantial verb form: This is the name given to this commonly used, unmarked, sDm=f / sDm.n=f verb form within Polotskyan school.The general linguistics school, eg. Antonio Loprieno, would describe the verb form as untransformed and 'aorist'. I try and use both in my descriptions.